--- In [email protected], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > In a message dated 9/17/06 9:40:32 A.M. Central Daylight Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > Yet those same 51 million and 59 million would have been led > > by those that would never have committed to liberating Afghanistan > > because "no nation has ever conquered the Afghans and we would > > fall into the same trap that the Russians fell into". > > Sorry, but imaginary scenarios about what Gore > or Kerry would have done do not an argument make. > > As for our having "liberated" Afghanistan, you > don't read the news much, I gather. > > No those were common liberal arguments why we should not invade Afghanistan.
Funny, I don't remember much arguing about invading Afghanistan, at least not after 9/11. > Kind of like the 50,000 body bags for US soldiers to take Baghdad caused by > gas and chemical attacks. I believe it was the Bushies who kept warning that Saddam was planning to use gas and chemicals against American troops. I never heard any conservative arguments why we > should not invade Afghanistan.Yes Afghanistan is liberated and has a > democratically elected government. Are things perfect and peaceful? No.But definitely > better off now than under the Taliban. You don't read the news much, I gather. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
