--- In [email protected], "feste37" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You are quite wrong here. It's hard to know why you feel compelled 
to make 
> cruel and untrue remarks about someone I presume you have never 
met.  
> (I've known Sharalyn for some years now.)   



Why do you say you presume Peter has never met her?

He writes below that she posted here on a regular basis.  I think 
that's a good way to "meet" someone and, indeed, a person's writings 
is probably the best way to get to know them.

So his opinion is based upon what he perceives she is like from her 
writing.  Nothing sinister or underhanded or cruel or untrue about 
that.



> 
> As for her article in the Source, I happened to overhear someone 
in a 
> restaurant here in Fairfield--an out-ot-town visitor—talking on 
his cell phone 
> about this article and how he had been inspired by it. So not 
everyone reacts 
> as you and others on this board have done. 
> 
> --- In [email protected], Peter <drpetersutphen@> 
wrote:
> >
> > Psychologically very difficult to read through an
> > article like that. It's a classic example of someone
> > who has not dealt with their "shadow" and denies and
> > surpresses any aspect of her psyche that she finds
> > unpleasant. She used to post here on a regular basis
> > and she sounded like an intelligent 16 year old. Rick
> > told me she was in her 50's! I doubt she has ever been
> > married and has had children. I say this because such
> > relationships tend to mature a person into dealing
> > with the realities of life. She's a prototypical TMO
> > cultie who refuses to consider anything outside of her
> > own world view. She'd be at home in any cult. Her
> > posts in FFL would usually consist of her telling us
> > how wrong our thoughts were. 
> > 
> > --- lurkernomore20002000 <steve.sundur@>
> > wrote:
> > 
> > > --- In [email protected], Peter
> > > <drpetersutphen@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Oh my God, her! She's an immature mood-maker
> > > supreme
> > > > who wears army boots.
> > > > 
> > > I tried three times to get through it. Just couldn't
> > > do it.
> > > 
> > > lurk
> > > > 
> > > > __________________________________________________
> > > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > > Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> > > protection around 
> > > > http://mail.yahoo.com
> > > >
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > To subscribe, send a message to:
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > 
> > > Or go to: 
> > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
> > > and click 'Join This Group!' 
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
>






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to