Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: What's happening outside Fairfield

[MDixon6569]

In a message dated 10/1/06 6:54:51 P.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: You just shouldn't be able to *torture* them to get information, whether they've been convicted or not. > Sheik Kahlid Mohammed was a suspect by that definition > yet we *tortured* him and saved lives and there are a > lot of people that want that stopped. You bet, there are a lot of people who stand by the Geneva Conventions, which prohibit torture. Torture isn't the only, or even the best, way to get information. Then as I said earlier, Let Osama and other terrorist organization leaders  all come to Geneva and sign the convention treaty and also live by it. I really doubt that the Geneva convention allows terrorism either, whether it is the intentional bombing of civilian targets or the beheading of anybody. Sometimes what you call *torture* is the only way to get information from a terrorist and should not be ruled out if it can save innocent lives. Do you think for one second that they wouldn't be torturing our people when given the chance? Ask Richard Pearl or Nicholas Berg or any of the others that were beheaded.  __._,_.___ To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe __,_._,___