--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Let's examine some more examples of Barry's > phoniness. > > --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote: > <snip> > > In it, he instructs the aspiring Inquisitor in the > > ways of dealing with a heretic. The stupid ones you > > can safely bring to trial, but if you find one who > > is somewhat clever or well-spoken, and he starts being > > clever in front of the faithful (who might be swayed > > by his words and begin to doubt the all-powerful > > nature of the Inquisition), > > Wonder who from FFL Barry is analogizing to "the > faithful"? That little detail seems to have > escaped him. Which "faithful" here does he > imagine himself to be swaying by his words? > > He appears to have forgotten that the "faithful" > here are the TM critics. The "heretics"--the underdog, > the persecuted--are the TMers. > > Does his casting me as the all-powerful Inquisitor > in fact inadvertently reveal something about his own > lack of self-assurance? > > you should immediately > > shift your strategy and begin to undermine his > > credibility. In other words, you should call the > > heretic names, but (and this is the interesting part > > given the context of your use of the term 'phony') > > "hazy" names, not specific names. > > > > The word he recommends is 'faux,' false. Its use > > in his passages is similar to your use of the > > word 'phony.' > > > > He specifically tells the young Inquisitor to > > avoid saying *what* about the heretic is false. > > The point is simply to call them "false," over > > and over and over, to make sure that the audience > > of the faithful begins to associate that word, and > > no other, with the particular heretic. > > > > Sound familiar? > > Not in connection with me, since, as Barry knows, > I've documented literally hundreds of his falsehoods > and gone into extensive detail about his phoniness. > > It's certainly familiar in connection with Barry, > though, who attempts to make sure the audience > of the faithful associates anyone who differs with > the TM critics with the term "True Believers," a > name he calls them over and over. You might even > say that's a "hazy" name. > > > (By the way, he even includes a section on how to > > repond if someone asks you, "The heretic in question > > is a false *what*?" He recommends that you say, "You > > all *know* the ways in which the heretic is false. > > You have seen him with your own eyes." As a result, > > I find your reply fairly hilarious. Thanks.) > > See above. The ways in which Barry is false and > phony have been thoroughly documented, including > in this post. > > > You use another technique that is straight out of > > Gui's manual for Inquisitors, calling people liars. > > Ooops, sorry...I got the spelling wrong: LIARS. :-) > > Barry suggests that I use all-caps. I don't, > of course. > > > The point again is to *associate* that word with > > the heretic in the minds of the "audience." Gui > > suggests that they specifically use this word when > > challenged by a heretic on matters of FAITH or > > BELIEF. The idea is to make the point that anyone > > who deviates from the dogma as defined by the > > Inquisition is not just wrong. They *know* the > > "real" Truth, and are attempting to spread heresy > > by LYING about it, and claiming to believe some- > > thing else. > > As Barry knows, I've never suggested someone > is lying about their faith and belief. > > > I'm just bringing these points up for your edification > > and for possible use in your own self discovery. > > Unfortunately, since none of Barry's tortured > "points" are at all germane except insofar as > they prove my contention that he's a phony, there > can be no "self-discovery" as a result, only more > discovery about the extent of his phoniness. > > I > > mean, the more I read about the Inquisition, the more > > it becomes obvious (to me, anyway) that you may have > > done time there. You might want to consider doing a > > past-life regression and trying to recover some actual > > memories of those lifetimes. > > I'm much more likely to have been heretic, actually, > a truth-teller fighting the establishment and standing > up to vicious slanderers like Barry. > > This whole rant of his is perhaps the best example > yet of his penchant for projection.
All of this because you don't want to tell us what it was like to roast people alive? Spoilsport. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
