"a petty, frivilous or unstable mind" in the large sense of the word
"mind" -- but more specifically the intellect. The mind does daily
manifest thoughts contrary to yesterday's. Thats its job. But just
because we have a thought, it doesn't make it a good thought, or
something we want to act on. Thats the role of the intellect:

Intellect: " hmm, the guys at MindCenter just sent this new one over
over. Those f*cking retards. Its totally different from ,and
contradicts what those lazy bastards sent over yesterday. OK. Lets see
what we have here. ...... OK, toaday's thought has no merit. it is
riddled in cognitive and logical errors. Its factually wrong. Why
those MindCenter guys couldn't figure this out, go f*cking figure!
Anyway, we are going with yesterdays thought. Until something better
roles around. Hear that you MindCenter retards!. I said "BETTER!", not
ANY" thought. Got it?"





--- In [email protected], new.morning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 
> Just curious Turq. Are your posts intended to inpsire and uplift Judy?
> Are your posts a reflection of grace and dignity? I ask you becuase in
> several nice posts you tried to inspire us to do the above. 
> 
> I guess its that stupid consistency thing -- where "A View" is "Any
> thought is good 'in the moment' but damn that thought if a day or two
> later 'I' get a different one that totally contracticts the 'great
> thoughts' of the prior day." 
> 
> Some people claim that is (towards) enlightenment. Some people say its
> signs of a petty, frivilous or unstable mind. 
> 
> 
> > 
> > --- authfriend <jstein@> wrote:
> > 
> > > --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB
> > > <no_reply@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend"
> > > <jstein@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Let's examine some more examples of Barry's
> > > > > phoniness.
> > > > > 
> > > > > --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB
> > > <no_reply@> 
> > > wrote:
> > > > > <snip>
> > > > > > In it, he instructs the aspiring Inquisitor in
> > > the
> > > > > > ways of dealing with a heretic. The stupid
> > > ones you 
> > > > > > can safely bring to trial, but if you find one
> > > who 
> > > > > > is somewhat clever or well-spoken, and he
> > > starts being 
> > > > > > clever in front of the faithful (who might be
> > > swayed
> > > > > > by his words and begin to doubt the
> > > all-powerful 
> > > > > > nature of the Inquisition),
> > > > > 
> > > > > Wonder who from FFL Barry is analogizing to "the
> > > > > faithful"?  That little detail seems to have
> > > > > escaped him.  Which "faithful" here does he
> > > > > imagine himself to be swaying by his words?
> > > > > 
> > > > > He appears to have forgotten that the "faithful"
> > > > > here are the TM critics.  The "heretics"--the
> > > underdog,
> > > > > the persecuted--are the TMers.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Does his casting me as the all-powerful
> > > Inquisitor
> > > > > in fact inadvertently reveal something about his
> > > own
> > > > > lack of self-assurance?
> > > > > 
> > > > >  you should immediately
> > > > > > shift your strategy and begin to undermine his
> > > 
> > > > > > credibility. In other words, you should call
> > > the 
> > > > > > heretic names, but (and this is the
> > > interesting part 
> > > > > > given the context of your use of the term
> > > 'phony') 
> > > > > > "hazy" names, not specific names.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > The word he recommends is 'faux,' false. Its
> > > use
> > > > > > in his passages is similar to your use of the 
> > > > > > word 'phony.'
> > > > > >
> > > > > > He specifically tells the young Inquisitor to
> > > > > > avoid saying *what* about the heretic is
> > > false.
> > > > > > The point is simply to call them "false," over
> > > 
> > > > > > and over and over, to make sure that the
> > > audience 
> > > > > > of the faithful begins to associate that word,
> > > and 
> > > > > > no other, with the particular heretic. 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Sound familiar?
> > > > > 
> > > > > Not in connection with me, since, as Barry
> > > knows,
> > > > > I've documented literally hundreds of his
> > > falsehoods
> > > > > and gone into extensive detail about his
> > > phoniness.
> > > > > 
> > > > > It's certainly familiar in connection with
> > > Barry,
> > > > > though, who attempts to make sure the audience 
> > > > > of the faithful associates anyone who differs
> > > with
> > > > > the TM critics with the term "True Believers," a
> > > > > name he calls them over and over.  You might
> > > even
> > > > > say that's a "hazy" name.
> > > > > 
> > > > > > (By the way, he even includes a section on how
> > > to
> > > > > > repond if someone asks you, "The heretic in
> > > question
> > > > > > is a false *what*?" He recommends that you
> > > say, "You
> > > > > > all *know* the ways in which the heretic is
> > > false.
> > > > > > You have seen him with your own eyes." As a
> > > result,
> > > > > > I find your reply fairly hilarious. Thanks.)
> > > > > 
> > > > > See above.  The ways in which Barry is false and
> > > > > phony have been thoroughly documented, including
> > > > > in this post.
> > > > > 
> > > > > > You use another technique that is straight out
> > > of
> > > > > > Gui's manual for Inquisitors, calling people
> > > liars.
> > > > > > Ooops, sorry...I got the spelling wrong:
> > > LIARS.  :-)
> > > > > 
> > > > > Barry suggests that I use all-caps.  I don't,
> > > > > of course.
> > > > > 
> > > > > > The point again is to *associate* that word
> > > with
> > > > > > the heretic in the minds of the "audience."
> > > Gui
> > > > > > suggests that they specifically use this word
> > > when
> > > > > > challenged by a heretic on matters of FAITH or
> > > 
> > > > > > BELIEF. The idea is to make the point that
> > > anyone
> > > > > > who deviates from the dogma as defined by the
> > > > > > Inquisition is not just wrong. They *know* the
> > > 
> > > > > > "real" Truth, and are attempting to spread
> > > heresy
> > > > > > by LYING about it, and claiming to believe
> > > some-
> > > > > > thing else.
> > > > > 
> > > > > As Barry knows, I've never suggested someone
> > > > > is lying about their faith and belief.
> > > > > 
> > > > > > I'm just bringing these points up for your
> > > edification
> > > > > > and for possible use in your own self
> > > discovery.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Unfortunately, since none of Barry's tortured
> > > > > "points" are at all germane except insofar as
> > > > > they prove my contention that he's a phony,
> > > there
> > > > > can be no "self-discovery" as a result, only
> > > more
> > > > > discovery about the extent of his phoniness.
> > > > > 
> > > > >  I
> > > > > > mean, the more I read about the Inquisition,
> > > the more
> > > > > > it becomes obvious (to me, anyway) that you
> > > may have
> > > > > > done time there. You might want to consider
> > > doing a 
> > > > > > past-life regression and trying to recover
> > > some actual 
> > > > > > memories of those lifetimes.
> > > > > 
> > > > > I'm much more likely to have been heretic,
> > > actually,
> > > > > a truth-teller fighting the establishment and
> > > standing
> > > > > up to vicious slanderers like Barry.
> > > > > 
> > > > > This whole rant of his is perhaps the best
> > > example
> > > > > yet of his penchant for projection.
> > > > 
> > > > All of this because you don't want to tell us
> > > > what it was like to roast people alive?
> > > > 
> > > > Spoilsport.
> > > 
> > > Q.E.D.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > To subscribe, send a message to:
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > 
> > > Or go to: 
> > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
> > > and click 'Join This Group!' 
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > 
> > > 
> > === message truncated ===
> > 
> > 
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
>





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to