On Nov 5, 2006, at 4:37 PM, curtisdeltablues wrote: > "You must have also missed the "Sidha dresses" phase--made the saris > look positively sexy." > > Saris are sexy, but you have to have the right walk to pull it off. > You can't charge ahead in them like you are late for the bus! The > head has to lag behind the plane of the hips I think, and you have to > walk slowly. New Morning help me out here!
Sounds like you got it down, Curtis. File that away for your next lifetime. :) I agree, actually, with women able to look attractive in saris--some of the silk ones are beautiful. When I made the first comment about frumpy, I really was thinking almost exclusively of the Sidha dresses. Remember those? Some of the styles were OK, but others were ghastly. I still wonder who did the designing, and what they were on. There is nothing even remotely feminine about looking like a bedraggled school-marm--and that's being generous. Give me a sari any day over those. I suppose the idea was to look "modest"...but I can think of any number of designs that would have looked modest but still very attractive and youthful. Fortunately the company died a natural death, or maybe somebody put it out of its misery. Sal To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
