--- In [email protected], new.morning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "sparaig" <sparaig@> wrote: <snip> > > True, but the study points out that these are the most > > violent, and possibly the least affected, by the ME, at > > least in the short term. > > But why should that be the case.
If you're washing a pot, the baked-on grease takes the most scrubbing to remove. > That is, if murders and rape did not > go down, they should specifically address that > in the research -- in instead of smothering/pooling > it -- and in refining the "theory". Rapes did go down (he says that in the rebuttal). The actual research paper *did* address the murder anomaly in detail and at some length. They didn't try to shove it under the rug.
