In a message dated 11/29/06 7:14:16 P.M. Central Standard Time,  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Excellent! Well thought out and well said. Notice Newt did not 
say  "let me" 
> make the new rules. He said we should all work together to  agree on 
new rules 
> that we can live with. But then maybe some  think that losing an 
occasional 
> city is worth protecting the  rights of terrorists.

Of course, it has nothing to do with  protecting
the rights of terrorists, and that kind of idiotic
and  offensive remark is why you people lost  the
election.




Well, as far as I can tell Newt is talking about interfering in terrorists  
use of the Internet, not yours. So who's *right* would he be interfering with?  
It certainly wasn't the Administration that wanted to confer constitutional  
rights on foreign enemies or Geneva convention rights on a group that never  
agreed to sign the Geneva convention or fight according to it's  rules.

Reply via email to