[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> In a message dated 11/29/06 8:27:15 P.M. Central Standard Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
>
>
>> In a message dated 11/29/06 6:22:43 P.M. Central Standard Time,
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) writes:
>>
>> This is a serious problem that will lead to a serious debate about
>>
>>
>>> the first amendment, but I think that the national security threat of
>>> losing an American city to a nuclear weapon, or losing several
>>> million Americans to a biological attack is so real that we need to
>>> proactively, now, develop the appropriate rules of engagement.
>>>
>>> And, I further think that we should propose a Genève convention for
>>> fighting terrorism which makes very clear that those who would fight
>>> outside the rules of law, those who would use weapons of mass
>>> destruction, and those who would target civilians are in fact subject
>>> to a totally different set of rules that allow us to protect
>>> civilization by defeating barbarism before it gains so much strength
>>> that it is truly horrendous.
>>>
>>> This is a sober topic, but I think it is a topic we need a national
>>> dialogue about, and we need to get ahead of the curve rather than
>>> wait until actually we literary lose a city which could literally
>>> happen within the next decade if we are unfortunate.
>>>
>>> _http://www.newt.http://www.nehttp://www.n_
>>>
> (http://www.newt.org/backpage.asp?art=3819)
>
>>>
>>>
>> Sounds like he's watched too many episodes of "24." :)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> No, Newt is ahead of the curve. Think about it now so you can prevent
>>
> these
>
>> things from happening or think about what we should have done after it
>> happens. Didn't the Blue Meanies take control of Pepperland because non of
>>
> the Bliss
>
>> Ninnies believed they were coming? And there ain't no more Beatles to sing
>>
>
>
>> All You Need Is Love.
>>
> For Newt to be ahead of the curve would require a change of the laws of
> physics. He's more like a throwback to the 16th century.
>
>
>
>
>
> I'll save this one. The next time we have a major attack on the homeland,
> I'll throw back in your face.
You're planning a major attack?
