--- In [email protected], Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > --- sparaig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > --- In [email protected], "larry.potter" > > <larry.potter@> wrote: > > > > > > < big snip> > > > << "Walking home from that bus ride, she felt like > > a "cloud of > > > awareness" following the body. The cloud was a > > witness located > > > behind and to the left of the body and completely > > separate from > > > body, mind and emotions. The witness was constant > > and so was FEAR, > > > the fear of complete physical dissolution. ..." >> > > > > > > > > > > > > I find SUZANNE's description to have > > contradictions, but maybe some > > > sees it in a different light. > > > > > > If Suzanne got to such detached state of > > non-localize witnessing > > > as she describes, how can she feel fear and terror > > at the same time? > > > > > > fear is only a delusion of a localized > > consciousness , meaning, > > > attachment to the boundaries while some of her > > description > > > suggests pure witnessing state, non boundaries > > state. > > > > > > maybe she was just in a transition states and her > > description > > > is a mere of what her mind was telling "her" what > > she is witnessing, > > > but I wouldn't take face-value her words .. > > > > I missed that part. Sounds like a classic separatist > > pathological rerealization state, for > > sure. > > Please! If you haven't read it, how can you make any > comment on it? I know, your dogma covers everything! > ;-) > >
So this doesn't sound like classic pathological derealization to you? > > << "Walking home from that bus ride, she felt like > a "cloud of > > awareness" following the body. The cloud was a > witness located > > behind and to the left of the body and completely > separate from > > body, mind and emotions. The witness was constant > and so was FEAR, > > the fear of complete physical dissolution. ..." >>
