jstein wrote:
> > > None of this is true. Chopra never sued Skolnick.
> > >
> > You may want to check your facts on this!
> >
> > "Your movement's SLAPP suit against me prevented my finishing
> > an article that examines the scientific evidence for the claims
> > of TM and Maharishi Ayurveda (those interested in seeing this
> > should stay tuned for a book in the works)."
> >
> > From: Andrew Skolnick
> > Date: Sun, Mar 12 1995 3:30 pm
> > Groups: sci.skeptic, sci.psychology, sci.med, alt.health.ayurveda
> > Subject: Chopra Credibility
> > http://tinyurl.com/y6ttvo
> >
> > One development noted at the recent CSICOP Conference in Dallas
> > was the fact that supporters of the Maharishi's "Ayur-Vedic
> > Medicine" have filed a SLAPP suit against Andrew Skolnick and
> > another editor at the Journal of the American Medical Association.
> >
> > Source: sci.skeptic
> >
sparaig wrote:
> This was 11 years ago. Where's skolnick's book on the subject?
>
Maybe he can't write his book because of the terms of the SLAPP suit.
Maybe' that's the reason his article was never quoted on Usenet.
According to Skolnick he was sued by the TMO and lost his job. Go
figure. But I still can't figure out why you guys keep talking but
never can seem to get around to actually quoting the Skolnick
'hoodwinked' article. What's the big secret?
