> > So, Skolnick was sued by the TMO, but the suit was dropped. > > jstein wrote: > It was dismissed. > So, Skolnick was sued by Chopra and the TMO but the suit was dismissed.
> > You said he was never sued by Chopra. > > > Right. > So, you were mistaken. > > Can you cite an instance where Skolnick's article was > > quoted on Usenet? I'd like to read it. > > > So go read the threads. > I'm reading them now but I don't find any quotes from you or anyone else on Usenet that quote Skolnick's article. > I'm not going to spend time looking up quotes you know > are there and are perfectly able to find yourself. > Why not - you seem to have plenty of time quoting Barry. From: Andrew A. Skolnick Date: Mon, Jul 12 1999 12:00 am Groups: alt.meditation.transcendental, sci.skeptic Subject: TM bullying of news media http://tinyurl.com/wcwcx TM apologists continue to lie that their SLAPP suit against the editor of JAMA, the AMA, and me was settled in their effort to discredit JAMA's article exposing the TM mvoement's deceitful marketing tactics. For example, Chopra's attorney even lied to Newsweek that we had settled with Chopra and the other plaintiffs for an undisclosed amount (Newsweek, Oct. 30, 1997, page 57). > > As you know, I think Skolnick got sued by the TMO. I think > > he got fired by JAMA. I think this was all because of his > > "Hoodwinked" article. > > > He may have been fired rather than resigned from JAMA, > but it had nothing to do with that article, as I've > already told you. > So, he may have gotten fired for the "hoodwinked" article. > I explained the circumstances. > From: Andrew A. Skolnick Date: Sat, Jun 26 1999 12:00 am Groups: alt.meditation.transcendental Subject: Andrew Skolnick finds AMA actions "despicable" http://tinyurl.com/tfar7 Judy lies here as well. By posting that message with its defamatory heading, Judy had hoped to attract the eyes of my employer and get me into trouble -- especially if I would have been foolish enough to respond to her nasty troll. > > And I think this is the reason there are no quotations of > > his article on Usenet. > > Oops, no, you keep making the same false statement. > There don't seem to be any quotations, but I'd like to read Skolnick's article "Hoodwinked" - where can I find it oin Usenet? > There are MANY quotations from his article on alt.m.t. > As you know, it was discussed at great length and > dissected and analyzed virtually line by line. > On which thread? From: Judy Stein Date: Sun, May 30 1999 12:00 am Groups: alt.meditation.transcendental, sci.skeptic Subject: Move Over Maharishi http://tinyurl.com/worhk At some point after the preliminary injunction ruling, plaintiffs moved to have Deepak Chopra, who had been extensively and viciously disparaged by name in Andrew's article, added as a plaintiff.
