--- In [email protected], "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > <snip> Hey, it's just the Paradox of Brahman. > > Not at all- its the failure of you and sparaig to just deal with Peter > as Peter, and instead thinking that he should act differently than he > is because he was talking about enlightened states earler.
But that *is* dealing with Peter as Peter! > No memo > > needed. I mean, if *anybody* can accuse somebody > > else of being "holier than thou," it's the > > enlightened person, right? > > I don't understand what you mean by this. The enlightened person is holiness personified. S/he really *is* holier-than-thou, so s/he gets to chide those who only pretend to be.
