--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <jflanegi@> > wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > <snip> Hey, it's just the Paradox of Brahman. > > > > Not at all- its the failure of you and sparaig to just deal with > Peter > > as Peter, and instead thinking that he should act differently than > he > > is because he was talking about enlightened states earler. > > But that *is* dealing with Peter as Peter! > > > No memo > > > needed. I mean, if *anybody* can accuse somebody > > > else of being "holier than thou," it's the > > > enlightened person, right? > > > > I don't understand what you mean by this. > > The enlightened person is holiness
(i.e., wholeness) personified. > S/he really *is* holier-than-thou, so s/he gets > to chide those who only pretend to be.
