--- In [email protected], Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > sparaig wrote: > > --- In [email protected], Bhairitu <noozguru@> wrote: > > > >> jim_flanegin wrote: > >> > >>> --- In [email protected], Bhairitu <noozguru@> wrote: > >>> <snip> > >>> > >>> > >>>> Sounds like the Maharishi Gulag program. I think 60 Minutes might > >>>> > >>>> > >>> want > >>> > >>> > >>>> to do a story. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> There is a unique feature here in Santa Clara, California where I > >>> live; a convent pretty much in the center of town, surrounded by adobe > >>> walls, about ten feet in height, the grounds sheltered by palms and a > >>> large grove of olive trees. There is a long driveway of about 75 yards > >>> to the main building, and although I have passed it many times, I've > >>> never been able to see anyone within the grounds. No windows are > >>> visible from the outside either. It has been around for about one > >>> hundred years. Poor bastards. > >>> > >> I have no problem with the privacy of ashrams, monasteries, or > >> convents. But those aren't prisons. People can still usually come and > >> go. This just adds to the cultist reputation of the TM movement. > >> > >> > > > > Perhaps, but there is an issue with what visa was obtained for all these > > guys. What kind of > > commitments did the TMO have to make to get the visas for hundreds > > (thousands?) of > > unemployable young men to come to the country for 2 years? > I would highly doubt that confinement was part of the commitments. If > so it will make an issue to alert progressive leaders about. >
Are the young men actually confined?
