--- In [email protected], "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "sparaig" <sparaig@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], Bhairitu <noozguru@> wrote: > > > > > > sparaig wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], Bhairitu <noozguru@> > wrote: > > > > > > > >> jim_flanegin wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> --- In [email protected], Bhairitu <noozguru@> > wrote: > > > >>> <snip> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>>> Sounds like the Maharishi Gulag program. I think 60 > Minutes might > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>> want > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>>> to do a story. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>> There is a unique feature here in Santa Clara, California > where I > > > >>> live; a convent pretty much in the center of town, > surrounded by adobe > > > >>> walls, about ten feet in height, the grounds sheltered by > palms and a > > > >>> large grove of olive trees. There is a long driveway of > about 75 yards > > > >>> to the main building, and although I have passed it many > times, I've > > > >>> never been able to see anyone within the grounds. No windows > are > > > >>> visible from the outside either. It has been around for > about one > > > >>> hundred years. Poor bastards. > > > >>> > > > >> I have no problem with the privacy of ashrams, monasteries, > or > > > >> convents. But those aren't prisons. People can still > usually come and > > > >> go. This just adds to the cultist reputation of the TM > movement. > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > Perhaps, but there is an issue with what visa was obtained for > all these guys. What > > kind of > > > > commitments did the TMO have to make to get the visas for > hundreds (thousands?) of > > > > unemployable young men to come to the country for 2 years? > > > I would highly doubt that confinement was part of the > commitments. If > > > so it will make an issue to alert progressive leaders about. > > > > > > > Are the young men actually confined? > > > chained in place is what I heard... >
Hopefully facing in a vastu direction...
