--- In [email protected], Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Dec 12, 2006, at 2:00 PM, TurquoiseB wrote:
>
> > --- In [email protected], "jim_flanegin"
<jflanegi@>
> > wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> --- In [email protected], kaladevi93 <no_reply@>
wrote:
> >>
> >>> If you think Vaj is a "TB", I guess you never really talked to
him
> >>> or heard his talk on Spiritual Anarchy and how genuine
spirituality
> >>> is anarchistic by nature...
> >>>
> >>
> >> Kind of funny to say someone that calls himself Vajranatha is a
> >> spiritual anarchist, don't you think? That name sounds very much
> >> aligned with organized religion, probably Tibetan Buddhism. Oh
well,
> >> one person's spiritual anarchist is another's religous shill,
eh?
> >>
> >
> > It's official. Jim has become Judy.
> >
> > Must be the soybeans.
> >
> > :-)
>
> I always just assumed he was holding his quartz crystal too
tightly.
>
> They are very similar. He doesn't even realize that the basic
> precepts of spiritual anarchy are actually on the FFL front page:
>
> "Believe nothing merely because you have been told it. Do not
believe
> what your teacher tells you merely out of respect for the
teacher.
> But whatsoever, after due examination and analysis, you find to
be
> kind, conducive to the good, the benefit, the welfare of all
beings
> -- that doctrine believe and cling to, and take it as your guide."
~
> Dharma-pada, Buddha Shakyamuni
>
> I can recommend no less.
>
Got it, Ken.
