--- In [email protected], "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], Peter <drpetersutphen@> wrote: > > > > This is what happens when science is used for PR > > purposes. The ME is full of holes. > > > Also I don't think it will ever work to use the results of science, > which measures phenomena objectively, to prove the benefits of a > technique that has as its purpose the unification of the subject and > object. As we used to say, 'does not compute'. > > The only thing that can be said with any certainty is that the ME > produces profoundly positive results. How? When? Where? Can't say. > It's, er, paradoxical... >
Why can't science measure such things? Its plausible that the ultimate result might be beyond scientific measurement, but insomuch as it is a "real world" phenomenon, there should be measureable real world effects.
