--- In [email protected], Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Jan 8, 2007, at 3:00 PM, jyouells2000 wrote:
>
> > The problem is, Jim, that unless someone(s) here has a personal
> > relationship
> > with Maharishi we (they) don't know what he knows. Just taking
what
> > has
> > come out here about Maharishi it's obvious that we only know
what he
> > presents
> > publically. Teachers, governors, re or decertified, have little
> > relationship with Maharishi. What we do have a peculiar kind of
PR.
> > There is so much hidden in the TMO, that unless we know from our
own
> > experience, we're just guessing...
>
> Or unless of course you knew and talked with one of M's closest
> confidants who helped set up SCI and the birth of the sidhi
> program... :-)
>
> Having done that you'd know that he knew none of this stuff, but
had
> to seek it out with couriers dispatched to various locales. You'd
> also know that much lecture material was also not his own. And I
> believe we have one a brother student of SBS who said flat out, M
> knew nothing about yoga: he was not a yogi!
>
> I know this is hard for some people, but it is the plain truth of
the
> matter.
>
yoga means union with God, so all you can say is you don't believe
Maharishi is in union with God. And I can't argue with that. I hold
a different view, but I can't argue with that.
