--- In [email protected], "jyouells2000" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
<snip> The problem is, Jim, that unless someone(s) here has a personal
> relationship
> with Maharishi we (they) don't know what he knows. Just taking what 
has
> come out here about Maharishi it's obvious that we only know what he
> presents
> publically.  Teachers, governors, re or decertified, have little
> relationship with Maharishi. What we do  have a peculiar kind of PR.
> There is so much hidden in the TMO, that unless we know from our own
> experience, we're just guessing...
> 
> JohnY
>
I agree that it ultimately comes down to an intuitive thing, a 
feeling, which I am entirely OK with. Trying to *prove* that Maharishi 
is anything other than what he has presented himself to be is like 
eating soup with a fork.

Reply via email to