On Jan 12, 2007, at 10:53 AM, authfriend wrote: > It shouldn't even need to be remarked that > "psychiatrists who have worked with TM people" > have been exposed only, or primarily, to TM > people *with pathology* of some sort. Unless > these psychiatrists are able to be heroically > objective, they're naturally going to associate > TM with pathology simply because those are the > TMers they see professionally.
Right, Judy, and if a shrink sees someone who happens to be a banker, lawyer or hair dresser, he or she is automatically going to associate those professions with pathology also. Makes perfect sense. Sal
