--- In [email protected], Sal Sunshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jan 12, 2007, at 10:53 AM, authfriend wrote: > > > It shouldn't even need to be remarked that > > "psychiatrists who have worked with TM people" > > have been exposed only, or primarily, to TM > > people *with pathology* of some sort. Unless > > these psychiatrists are able to be heroically > > objective, they're naturally going to associate > > TM with pathology simply because those are the > > TMers they see professionally. > > Right, Judy, and if a shrink sees someone who happens to be > a banker, lawyer or hair dresser, he or she is automatically > going to associate those professions with pathology also. > Makes perfect sense.
<snore> Bogus analogy, Sal. But you knew that.
