--- In [email protected], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>  
> In a message dated 1/24/07 1:48:01 P.M. Central Standard Time,  
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> 
> "Asked  to reflect on his Oct. 24 statement that
> 'absolutely, we're winning,' Bush  said that response
> was 'an indication of my belief we're going to  win.'"
> 
> Hardly a comparison to prophetic speak that the world would
> be rid of Israel and the US soon. Bush has the ability to
> win in Iraq with the worlds greatest military, the question
> is does he have the political will to  win.

My *point* was, of course, that when he said
"Absolutely, we're winning," we weren't winning
by any stretch of the imagination.  When he
admitted this to the Washington Post, and they
asked him why he had said we *were* winning, he
responded that he believed we were *going* to
win--i.e., he was being prophetic.

You said Ahmadinejad would look like a nut if
he were being merely prophetic about Israel and
the U.S. being destroyed, as opposed to having
in mind a way to destroy them (i.e., a threat).

So I'm asking (you carefully snipped it), why
doesn't Bush look like a nut as well?


Reply via email to