I had a long conversation with Sai Baba's former English translator, 
an American, many years ago, and he told me then that Baba was a 
fake. That the ash, trinkets were stored in a warehouse, and that 
Baba had no power. He uses sleigth of hand. He certainly has no 
teaching. I've been to one of his ashrams, and they've got nothing, 
just vague Hindu mumbo jumbo that I'm not sure even they understand. 
It's nowhere. 

Frank

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "markmeredith2002" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> <curtisdeltablues@> wrote:
> >
> > I don't know if Sai Baba pulls the whole Michael Jackson "beat it"
> > routine with kids, but I do know that he is a shitty magician.  
I've
> > seen the tapes of his versions of tricks that I learned when I 
was 10
> > years old.  I saw his fumbling version of the "steal the Vibhuti 
from
> > the napkin while pretending to wipe your hands" trick.  I've seen 
the
> > same double sided vase that I got for my birthday as a kid, used 
to
> > amaze his gullible followers. I've seen him palm amulets and 
produce
> > them on film as if he pulled them out of his cosmic ass. You are
> > letting him get away with a magic act that would not cut it in a 
4th
> > grade talent show.  
> 
> Yes I've seen the slow motion videos exposing SB faking his
> manifestations and have heard accounts from insiders of how SB 
keeps a
> big closet full of trinkets that later get "manifested".  I've also
> been told that SB did practice various occult techniques as a
> youngster that gave him some "sidhis" and some of his magic acts are
> real, but he doesn't always have the juice flowing so he also fakes 
in
> order to keep his followers amazed.  The real problem here is that
> followers would actually think his tricks, real or fake, are
> indicative of spiritual enlightenment.
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> >  
> > 
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "markmeredith2002"
> > <markmeredith@> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Lsoma@ wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Easy does it. Sai Baba is not a petafile. If you are so 
certain that
> > > Sai  
> > > > Baba is then get someone to video tape it. Stop listening to
> > > everyone and  
> > > > everything. If you do the bullshit piles up and you can get 
it all
> > over
> > > > yourself. Go within for your answers. If you want to visit 
every
> > > website  
> > > > that has stories to degrade anyone
> > > > then you have too much free time. Go to the dome and hop 
around for
> > > world  
> > > > peace. It would be healthier
> > > > than finding out what Guru screwed who. It is no wonder the 
world is
> > > the  way 
> > > > it is with so many people lacking faith in some higher good. 
Let the
> > > angels  
> > > > of God judge Sai Baba. No one gets away with anything anyhow. 
Change
> > > the 
> > > > channel  and get a new antenna. Or as Maharishi used to say-
Focus on
> > > the rose not 
> > > > the  thorns. Stop judging every teacher that comes along and 
let
> > > them work out 
> > > > there  own karma. Be thankful
> > > > for what they have given to us. Everyone changes in their 
own  time.
> > > Lsoma.
> > > >
> > > The info on Sai Baba being a pedophile is now overwhelming, not 
from
> > > scandalous websites but mainly from former leaders of his org., 
many
> > > of whom had children sodomized and verified by doctors.  These 
were
> > > people who did not want to believe the truth about Sai Baba but
> > > couldn't ignore the evidence after much agonizing.  Do some 
common
> > > sense research on this rather than listening to channelers.
> > > 
> > > Spiritual people look the other way when children are being 
molested?
> > >  The world is a bad place because people show some 
discrimination as
> > > to who is and who isn't a true spiritual teacher?  
> > > 
> > > I had a very open mind about this issue when I first came 
across it,
> > > but I can't find any supporter of Sai Baba who's making any 
reasonable
> > > argument, just the above spiritual jive talk.  
> > > 
> > > Walking around in robes talking about God and periodically 
displaying
> > > some sidhis due to a grossly inbalanced kundalini process 
doesn't
> > > provide any kind of cover for grossly dark behavior.
> > >
> >
>


Reply via email to