--- In [email protected], "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], new.morning <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > We all thank you Jim in your path of cleaning Vaj's karma. I just > hope > > the added karmic burden on you is not too harsh. May the Divine shine > > brightly in both of you. > > > "karmic burden"? isn't life itself a karmic burden?
"Life" -- is the Triple E ride (1960's Disneyland reference) through our karma. Whether that is a burden or a joy I suppose is in the eyes of the beholder. "The purpose of life is the expansion of happiness" view is that it is all "a joy". My original comment was referencing something directly not in GD's text, " criticism helps the earnest seeker and even the wise, to wash off their sins and that in reality criticism is a support for their spiritual development." but rather some added insights or views MMY has provided on this same topic. According to him, FWIW, not only does criticism wash "sins" / negative karma from the criticizee, but those same "sins" are taken on by the criticizer. Thus, per the above karmic "theory" > Lil' Vaj can say whatever he wants, and I'll > enjoy responding to it. It should be clear from my responses that I > don't care for his criticism of Maharishi because as I've said, he > is a faux-Buddhist and full of crap, but that is much more his > business than mine... you are a saintly person, taking on some of Vaj's negative karma, upon yourself -- surely out of compassion for Vaj's quick evolution. The above karmic theory may also shed light on those who see "mere" anger in MMY at times when he lambasts someone on staff for stuff. Even odd and non-logical stuff (CIA, etc.) In my experience, I never saw him express "personal anger", but it was always anger focused on organizational things. And often on a specific individual. This outburst of anger by a "master" could be seen, per the above theory (which has been "tested" -- but the results are more antectodal than statistical) as a great blessing. Some big karmic block taken on by master via the mechanics of "criticism". Of course some skeptics will see this as a nice cover-up and story for personal bad behavior. All views welcome. :) >But thank you for > your remarks nonetheless. Your welcome as always. >
