--- In [email protected], new.morning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], "jim_flanegin" <jflanegi@> 
wrote:
> >
> > --- In [email protected], new.morning <no_reply@> 
wrote:
> > >
> > > We all thank you Jim in your path of cleaning Vaj's karma. I 
just 
> > hope
> > > the added karmic burden on you is not too harsh. May the 
Divine shine
> > > brightly in both of you.
> > > 
> > "karmic burden"? isn't life itself a karmic burden? 
> 
> "Life" -- is the Triple E ride (1960's Disneyland reference) 
through
> our karma. Whether that is a burden or a joy I suppose is in the 
eyes
> of the beholder. "The purpose of life is the expansion of 
happiness"
> view is that it is all "a joy".

Pretty much, if one survives it. 
> 
> My original comment was referencing something directly not in GD's 
text,
> 
> " criticism helps the
> earnest seeker and even the wise, to wash off their
> sins and that in reality criticism is a support for
> their spiritual development."
> 
> but rather some added insights or views MMY has provided on this 
same
> topic. According to him, FWIW, not only does criticism 
wash "sins" /
> negative karma from the criticizee, but those same "sins" are 
taken on
> by the criticizer.
> 
> Thus, per the above karmic "theory"
> 
> > Lil' Vaj can say whatever he wants, and I'll
> > enjoy responding to it. It should be clear from my responses 
that I
> > don't care for his criticism of Maharishi because as I've said, 
he
> > is a faux-Buddhist and full of crap, but that is much more his
> > business than mine...
> 
> you are a saintly person, taking on some of Vaj's negative karma, 
upon
> yourself -- surely out of compassion for Vaj's quick evolution.

Can't say, though I enjoy your tongue in cheek remarks.
> 
> The above karmic theory may also shed light on those who see "mere"
> anger in MMY at times when he lambasts someone on staff for stuff.
> Even odd and non-logical stuff (CIA, etc.) 
> 
> In my experience, I never saw him express "personal anger", but it 
was
> always anger focused on organizational things. And often on a 
specific
> individual. This outburst of anger by a "master" could be seen, per
> the above theory (which has been "tested" -- but the results are 
more
> antectodal than statistical) as a great blessing. Some big karmic
> block taken on by master via the mechanics of "criticism". 
> 
> Of course some skeptics will see this as a nice cover-up and story 
for
>    personal bad behavior. All views welcome. :) 
> 
> 
> >But thank you for 
> > your remarks nonetheless.
> 
> Your welcome as always.
> >
>
I enjoy your well thought out remarks on karma and such. I just 
don't think about it (karma) much one way or another. Regarding my 
actions generally I just do what comes naturally. If it comes around 
and bites me in the butt at some point, oh well...

Reply via email to