> > You failed to note that Bush was elected by a majority of Americans > > AFTER the invasion of Iraq. > > off_world_beings wrote: > In a fixed election, he scraped by. You must be so embarrassed. > You haven't posted any evidence that the election was fixed. In the U.S., the President is elected by the Electoral Congress - it's a representative government, not a popular direct vote. Bush won, Gore lost - it's as simple as that. > > You also failed to note that almost 95% of your congressional > > leaders voted to use force to oust Saddam, including your > > candidate for President and Vice-President > > > MY candidate?....get real. > There were only two candidates. So, you're saying that you didn't have a candidate, so you didn't vote in the election. Go figure. Eighty-one Dems voted to authorize the President to use force in Iraq. Not one single candidate for President voted against the resolution.
> I am saying and have said all along that the call to war in Iraq > would lead to a quagmire that will drag the US deep into deep shit. > So, you're saying that the U.S. is in a war that was called by most of your congressional leaders. > You did not predict this. It was obvious. That makes you a lesser > mind, and insignificant in the world of ideas, along with anyone > else that supported the war, I don't care which side they are on. > Only the sub-species thinks that if you critisize one side then > you must be all for the other side. Football team mentality > sub-species arrogance that got you into the mess you are in in the > first place. > So, the eighty-one Dems that voted in favor of the resolution to use force are a "sub-species" of humans and of a lesser mind than yourself. > > And not a single candidate would agree with your political > > opinion on an immediate withdrawal of U.S. forces from the > > Middle East. > > > When did I call for an immediate withdrawal? > So, you're in favor of staying the course, not withdrawing, and you're not in favor of a surge. > Republicans always LIE about this. > So, you're saying that Jack Murtha and Nancy Pelosi aren't in favor of an immediate withdrawal. > Are you on drugs like Rush Limbaugh and Ted Haggard? > The arguementum ad hominiem attack is the second to last resort of someone who is losing a debate and is unable to respond with legitimacy. My solution? Fight a war to win - kill your enemies and protect your weakest point.
