--- In [email protected], "Richard J. Williams" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > You failed to note that Bush was elected by a majority of 
Americans
> > > AFTER the invasion of Iraq.
> > >
> off_world_beings wrote: 
> > In a fixed election, he scraped by. You must be so embarrassed.
> >
> You haven't posted any evidence that the election was fixed. In the
> U.S., the President is elected by the Electoral Congress - it's a
> representative government, not a popular direct vote. Bush won, Gore
> lost - it's as simple as that.>>


You may be able to type 90 words a minute but you sure cannot keep up 
with your own words. YOU were talking about the 2004 election for 
which there was evidence of meddling with the process and the results 
in key states...Ohio and New Hampshire for example.
  

> > > You also failed to note that almost 95% of your congressional
> > > leaders voted to use force to oust Saddam, including your
> > > candidate for President and Vice-President
> > >
> > MY candidate?....get real.
> >
> There were only two candidates. So, you're saying that you didn't 
have
> a candidate, so you didn't vote in the election. Go figure. Eighty-
one
> Dems voted to authorize the President to use force in Iraq. Not one
> single candidate for President voted against the resolution.>


There were many more than 2 candidates. This is not a football game, 
only sub-species thinks that.


> > I am saying and have said all along that the call to war in Iraq 
> > would lead to a quagmire that will drag the US deep into deep 
shit.
> >
> So, you're saying that the U.S. is in a war that was called by most 
of your congressional leaders.>>>


I don't have a vote in the US. So I am exempt from your pathetic 
football team mentality. Your brain must be ceasing up you are so 
entrenched in believing in your ignorant BORN-AGAIN FUNDAMENTALIST 
administration. That means THEY believe that YOU are going straight 
to hell and that you are inferior to them. You are inferior in God's 
eyes than to them. 


>  
> > You did not predict this. It was obvious. That makes you a lesser 
> > mind, and insignificant in the world of ideas, along with anyone
> > else that supported the war, I don't care which side they are on.
> > Only the sub-species thinks that if you critisize one side then 
> > you must be all for the other side. Football team mentality
> > sub-species arrogance that got you into the mess you are in in the
> > first place.
> >
> So, the eighty-one Dems that voted in favor of the resolution to use
> force are a "sub-species" of humans and of a lesser mind than 
yourself.>>


Yes, of course. Whats your point?


> > > And not a single candidate would agree with your political 
> > > opinion on an immediate withdrawal of U.S. forces from the 
> > > Middle East.
> > >
> > When did I call for an immediate withdrawal? 
> > 
> So, you're in favor of staying the course, not withdrawing, and 
you're
> not in favor of a surge.
> 
> > Republicans always LIE about this. 
> >
> So, you're saying that Jack Murtha and Nancy Pelosi aren't in favor 
of
> an immediate withdrawal.>>>


Democrats are not in favor of this. You listen to Rush Limbaugh and 
Fox news too much and it has addled your brain.


> 
> > Are you on drugs like Rush Limbaugh and Ted Haggard?
> > 
> The arguementum ad hominiem attack is the second to last resort of
> someone who is losing a debate and is unable to respond with 
legitimacy.>>


Claiming that someone is loosing a debate is a sure sign that you 
have no argument of any substance.

Oh, and about ad hominem attacks...er, yea, I made a few already, but 
I hope you didn't take it personally when I said that your thinking 
belongs in a sub-species that is going extinct due to natural 
selection. It is just a fact of life, not something you should take 
personally. Your kind are going extinct. No worries, someone has to 
take the fall for evolution.

> 
> My solution? Fight a war to win - kill your enemies and protect your
> weakest point.>>

You don't understand your enemies or war. You are like a kid, go play 
computer games. This is not the second world war that you are used 
to. Your kind has no place in the 20th century. Your MOAB's won't 
save you. You cannot win that way. Your species is becoming extinct 
because only smart strategy will win...Smart strategy is as far away 
from GW Bush's brain as the Earth is to the Crab Nebula.

Iraq was no threat to the USA, did not harbor Al Quaida,hated Al 
Quaida, and the only WMD's that Iraq had were old depleted ones given 
to them by Reagan, Rumsfeld, Cheney, and Bush Snr in the '80's.

OffWorld


Reply via email to