[FairfieldLife] Re: we have responded 2 much lets just not respond to Vaj.Ignore all is missives

[jim_flanegin]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick Archer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of sparaig
> Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2007 1:37 PM
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: we have responded 2 much lets just 
not respond
> to Vaj.Ignore all is missives
> 
> > 
> > Of course not. That's why there's no proving this issue one way 
or the
> > other. Nothing to make a court case out of. You examine the 
evidence, talk
> > to sources directly if you're able, and reach your own 
conclusions. I
> heard
> > and dismissed these allegations for decades before changing my 
opinion, so
> I
> > understand why you're clinging to yours.
> >
> 
> I'm not clinging as far as I can tell. TM works for me. The sidhis 
seem to
> be beneficial, at 
> least in the long-run. What does NOT work for me is to claim that 
there is
> ample evidence 
> that someone was celibate for 40+ years than suddenly became a sex 
machine
> for 10 
> years than became celibate again for the rest of his life.
> 
>  
> 
> The evidence may be "ample" but it is clearly not adequate for 
some. Some
> folks here would need to see a video of the alleged affairs to 
believe they
> happened. Even that might be doubted. It depends on how invested 
one is in
> one's worldview.
>
Ew, no video, Please.