Somewhat parallel to Sprarig's point, if even if a person went outside the norm, even outside the law for 5 years over a 90 year life, 70 year career, most would see it as a minor abberation, a minor blip in the longer trend. I tend to, i think most tend to, look at the longer run an give people some slack for "short" periods of messing up.
Some people mess up, redeem themselves, some by going to jail, return to society and lead productive, contributive lives to society. Whether having sex with consenting adults is actually "messing up" is another issue. Power issues and teacher status are troublesome. Still it was not a lifelong practice from what i know. Maybe 5-6 years, in 1967-73 time range. If this activity was a 40 year pattern, then it would be more noteworthy. Lets assume the accounts are all true -- over a five year span. Does that diminish everything else he has done? Of course, he has done other things, over the past 30 years, which to me are "sadder" in terms of not fulfilling or dampening progress towards the early 70's SIMS and World Plan vision. --- In [email protected], "Rick Archer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of sparaig > Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2007 1:37 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: we have responded 2 much lets just not respond > to Vaj.Ignore all is missives > > > > > Of course not. That's why there's no proving this issue one way or the > > other. Nothing to make a court case out of. You examine the evidence, talk > > to sources directly if you're able, and reach your own conclusions. I > heard > > and dismissed these allegations for decades before changing my opinion, so > I > > understand why you're clinging to yours. > > > > I'm not clinging as far as I can tell. TM works for me. The sidhis seem to > be beneficial, at > least in the long-run. What does NOT work for me is to claim that there is > ample evidence > that someone was celibate for 40+ years than suddenly became a sex machine > for 10 > years than became celibate again for the rest of his life. > > > > The evidence may be "ample" but it is clearly not adequate for some. Some > folks here would need to see a video of the alleged affairs to believe they > happened. Even that might be doubted. It depends on how invested one is in > one's worldview. >
