--- In [email protected], "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "sparaig" <sparaig@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], Sal Sunshine <salsunshine@> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mar 7, 2007, at 9:24 AM, authfriend wrote: > > > > > > > > >> On Mar 7, 2007, at 8:19 AM, authfriend wrote: > > > > >> > > > > >>> Barry, all of us--including yourself--understand > > > > >>> what you're attempting here: you're trying to > > > > >>> shut your critics up > > > > >> > > > > >> He's trying to shut you up by reposting your words and actually > > > > >> encouraging you to say more? Wow, that Barry sure is clever. > > > > > > > > > > No, just disingenuous. As are you. > > > > > > > > Sure glad we got *that* one settled. :) > > > > > > > > You know, Judy, if you're so upset about seeing your own words > > > > supposedly out of context (I believe you said that a while back) > > just > > > > go through what Barry posts and give the context. Considering > > the > > > > amount you usually post by your own admission, I would think > > that > > > > would not be much of a problem. > > > > > > Except, Brry hsan't told us where he is repeating the words. And > > googling a phrase, > > > doesn't always reveal all instances of that phrase on the internet, > > because not all forums > > > are archived in google, I've noticed. > > > > They can use the Yahoo Groups search feature on > > the FFL page and find out whose post it was. And > > they'll also get the context. > > > > (Note that Sal is using Barry's trick of pretending > > any TMer who comes up with a criticism is "upset.") > > > > Insomuch as why else would someone bother to post save > that they care about what they are posting about, you're > left with the choices: "upset with" or "supporting" the > thing you're posting about.
Uh, no. Lots of other possibilities. > So yeah, any "criticism," MUST be because you're "upset." >
