--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "sparaig" <sparaig@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], Sal Sunshine <salsunshine@> > wrote: > > > > > > You know, Judy, if you're so upset about seeing your own words > > > supposedly out of context (I believe you said that a while back) > > > just go through what Barry posts and give the context. > > > Considering the amount you usually post by your own admission, > > > I would think that would not be much of a problem. > > > > Except, Brry hsan't told us where he is repeating the words. And > > googling a phrase, doesn't always reveal all instances of that > > phrase on the internet, because not all forums > > are archived in google, I've noticed. > > They can use the Yahoo Groups search feature on > the FFL page and find out whose post it was. And > they'll also get the context. > > (Note that Sal is using Barry's trick of pretending > any TMer who comes up with a criticism is "upset.")
And note that the person who has now made at least a dozen posts complaining about the lack of context -- to at least two different Internet forums -- is now claiming that she "isn't upset." And on the 3rd forum she posted to in the last few days, trying to do damage control surrounding THINGS TMers BELIEVE, the thing she "wasn't upset" about there was a comment from me correcting a typo in which I mentioned that someone we knew in common who had met her had described her as looking...uh...old. Judy...this is another one of those things that you'd rather prefer to believe is a lie or a trick on my part, but it's another of those things that is not. The person in question *did* say that. Duh. You *are* old...what's your problem with *looking* old? But think of it this way...now you have one more thing to be "not upset" about, don't you? :-)
