--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], "curtisdeltablues" 
> <curtisdeltablues@> wrote:
> >
> > "> Sure, Judy, and the fact that a number of people living
> > > on top of grates in DC say they like "their neighborhoods"
> > > must mean they're not homeless either, right?  You just
> > > can't give up on your fantasies."
> > 
> > I think the exemption only extends to guys who claim to have a
> > connection with God. Those homeless guys are the saints that we
> > should think of differently.  Here in DC that is about one out
> > of three guys on the street.  In fact I handed a George 
Washington 
> > to a guy the other day who was quoting the Bible so convincingly
> > I almost let him put his hand on my head to save me.  
>  
> Maybe you should have let him.
> 
> I'm just fascinated by the nearsightedness of this
> perspective and the extremely selective way you
> pick and choose the evidence for it.
> 
> How many of these homeless guys, if you plucked
> them off the street, dressed them up in robes,
> gave them a fancy house with lots of servants,
> and appointed them the leader of, say, a prominent
> Christian denomination, would actually end up
> fulfilling the expectations for a person in such a
> position?
>
To say nothing of coping with Guru Dev's well known rule for 
accepting *zero* donations or income from the outside. Nothing.

Reply via email to