Judy: "Uh-huh. Thing is, it's not as obvious as you'd like to think. Maybe you should just work on being more straightforward:"
Me: I was wondering how you would spin your ridiculous misunderstanding as my fault. Nice touch not backing down on the victim point. <horselaugh> --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "curtisdeltablues" > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote: > > > > > They woke me up in the middle of the night and forced me to > > > > buy a deerskin against my will. > > > > > > <horselaugh> > > > > > > I'm sorry, Curtis, but how do you expect to be > > > taken seriously with an assertion like that? > > > > > > I don't expect jokes to be taken seriously Judy. Given how obvious > > that was I certainly don't expect to be understood in anything more > > subtle. > > Uh-huh. Thing is, it's not as obvious as > you'd like to think. > > Maybe you should just work on being more > straightforward: > > > > <Snip> > > > > > > Curtis: Since I have repeated numerous times that I was not > > > > > > victimized by the movement, this statement is knowingly > false. > > > > > > > > > > Well, no, it's not. It may be "false," but not > > > > > knowingly. It's based on what you've said here > > > > > and on alt.m.t, and goodness knows I'm not the > > > > > only person to understand it that way, your denials > > > > > notwithstanding. > > > > > > > > So even though I do not consider myself a victim, because I > > > > chose my participation freely, you can label me a victim and > > > > criticize me for being a victim? > > > > > > Uh, no. See if you can extract a more appropriate > > > meaning from what I wrote. >
