--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "george_deforest" > <george.deforest@> wrote: > > people here on FFL seem to be jumping to the conclusion that > > Vedic City is automatically "wrong" for this aggressiveness. > > (just like the grand-standing county supervisors want you to) > > > They ARE automatically wrong. They should pay the farmer what he is > asking, or if they deem his price above market value, then they wait. > The insidious thing about eminent domain seizures is that they create > a precedent that can then be exercised more loosely next time the city > wants to annex land. And please give me a break- I've seen pictures of > the booming metropolis of so called Vedic "City", and they honestly > don't need more land, and won't for quite a while...:-)
This situation is EXACTLY the kind of PR nightmare the community doesn't need. They should pay the guy what he wants for his property. Or, better yet, buy acreage for a city park within VC. Is there some legal reason why VC can't pull their eminent domain stunt against Global Country, which owns hundreds and hundreds of undeveloped acres inside VC?
