--- In [email protected], "Rory Goff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yes, I don't really see the people on FFL lined up into the two 
> camps 
> you described, Turq, and I am not trying to heal Judy. I see nothing 
> in Judy that needs fixing, any more than I see anything in you that 
> needs fixing. I didn't find when I tried to point out her a-priori 
> enlightenment, that she just "got mad." Rather, she showed me rich 
> and lovely multisensory layers of a particle-self of mine that had 
> *not* been loved before -- including constriction,  stagnation, 
> suffocation, deep shame, and finally, beneath it all, Love. That's 
> how the process usually works for me -- I introduce a Truth, process 
> the bodymind's objections, and discover a deeper and richer 
> synthesis as all my particles come to Understand and be Understood 
> in a whole new light.
> 
> That's my *only* "goal" in communicating with anyone here -- to find 
> more of my unloved and underappreciated particles and to Understand 
> and Love them, and thereby to be Understood and Loved -- to expand, 
> to grow in simplicity, while simultaneously becoming more rich and 
> subtle and nuanced and complex. It's fun -- generally delightful and 
> immensely rewarding. 
> 
> I do this because for me there is no real difference between a small 
> self and a large Self. Loving the small self is feeding oblations to 
> the large Self, expanding the influence of the large Self, helping 
> the Immense and the infinitesimal to appreciate each other as two 
> sides of the same coin. Being Shiva, utterly free, includes adoring 
> Shakti -- every particle of Creation -- as Shiva's bodymind, the 
> perfect Lover.
> 
> Whether any of this has *any* bearing on what *you guys* go 
> through, "out there, outside of me" -- if there *is* an "out there, 
> outside of me" -- is of no real import to me; it's not my business; 
> it can't be my business. Shalom Shanti Shanti! :-)

Well said.



Reply via email to