--- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], "Rory Goff" <rorygoff@>
wrote:
> >
> > Yes, I don't really see the people on FFL lined up into the two
> > camps
> > you described, Turq, and I am not trying to heal Judy. I see
nothing
> > in Judy that needs fixing, any more than I see anything in you
that
> > needs fixing. I didn't find when I tried to point out her a-
priori
> > enlightenment, that she just "got mad." Rather, she showed me
rich
> > and lovely multisensory layers of a particle-self of mine that
had
> > *not* been loved before -- including constriction, stagnation,
> > suffocation, deep shame, and finally, beneath it all, Love.
That's
> > how the process usually works for me -- I introduce a Truth,
process
> > the bodymind's objections, and discover a deeper and richer
> > synthesis as all my particles come to Understand and be
Understood
> > in a whole new light.
> >
> > That's my *only* "goal" in communicating with anyone here -- to
find
> > more of my unloved and underappreciated particles and to
Understand
> > and Love them, and thereby to be Understood and Loved -- to
expand,
> > to grow in simplicity, while simultaneously becoming more rich
and
> > subtle and nuanced and complex. It's fun -- generally delightful
and
> > immensely rewarding.
> >
> > I do this because for me there is no real difference between a
small
> > self and a large Self. Loving the small self is feeding
oblations to
> > the large Self, expanding the influence of the large Self,
helping
> > the Immense and the infinitesimal to appreciate each other as
two
> > sides of the same coin. Being Shiva, utterly free, includes
adoring
> > Shakti -- every particle of Creation -- as Shiva's bodymind, the
> > perfect Lover.
> >
> > Whether any of this has *any* bearing on what *you guys* go
> > through, "out there, outside of me" -- if there *is* an "out
there,
> > outside of me" -- is of no real import to me; it's not my
business;
> > it can't be my business. Shalom Shanti Shanti! :-)
>
> Well said.
>
Are you familiar with the expression, "The courage of your
convictions." Just curious how you reconcile apparently not having
any.:-)
