--- In [email protected], "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_reply@> > wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "Rory Goff" <rorygoff@> > wrote: > > > > > > Yes, I don't really see the people on FFL lined up into the > > > camps two you described, Turq, and I am not trying to heal > > > Judy. I see nothing in Judy that needs fixing, any more > > > than I see anything in you that needs fixing. I didn't find > > > when I tried to point out her a-priori enlightenment, that > > > she just "got mad." Rather, she showed me rich and lovely > > > multisensory layers of a particle-self of mine that had > > > *not* been loved before -- including constriction, stagnation, > > > suffocation, deep shame, and finally, beneath it all, Love. > > > That's how the process usually works for me -- I introduce a > > > Truth, process the bodymind's objections, and discover a > > > deeper and richer synthesis as all my particles come to > > > Understand and be Understood in a whole new light. > > > > > > That's my *only* "goal" in communicating with anyone here -- > > > to find more of my unloved and underappreciated particles and > > > to Understand and Love them, and thereby to be Understood and > > > Loved -- to expand, to grow in simplicity, while simultaneously > > > becoming more rich and subtle and nuanced and complex. It's > > > fun -- generally delightful and immensely rewarding. > > > > > > I do this because for me there is no real difference between > > > a small self and a large Self. Loving the small self is feeding > > > oblations to the large Self, expanding the influence of the > > > large Self, helping the Immense and the infinitesimal to > > > appreciate each other as two sides of the same coin. Being > > > Shiva, utterly free, includes adoring Shakti -- every particle > > > of Creation -- as Shiva's bodymind, the perfect Lover. > > > > > > Whether any of this has *any* bearing on what *you guys* go > > > through, "out there, outside of me" -- if there *is* an "out > > > there, outside of me" -- is of no real import to me; it's not > > > my business; it can't be my business. Shalom Shanti Shanti! :-) > > > > Well said. > > Are you familiar with the expression, "The courage of your > convictions." Just curious how you reconcile apparently not > having any.:-)
I'm not sure who you are speaking to here. If to me, I see no problem with anything Rory said. It's just as valid a way of seeing things as was mine. And far more poetic. I repeat my earlier "review" -- Well said. If to Rory, that's not my business -- is of no real import to me. :-)
