--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Not only did Curtis not come to me in an open,
> straightforward manner, the dishonesty of his
> response was even greater than that of his
> original bogus comparison.
>
> That comparison was offensive and insulting, a
> deliberate attempt at guilt by association.
> There were all sorts of comparisons he *could*
> have made on the basis you suggest above
> ("incomplete information and ignorance") that
> would have been entirely unproblematic and
> would have made his point a lot more clearly.
>
> That you *support* him in the comparison he did
> make, and in his dishonest responses to my
> pointing out how offensive it was, tells me, as
> I say, all I need to know about your own
> intellectual integrity.
>
> "May not be 100% congruent," indeed.
>
> Excuse me while I go take a bath.
After 36 -- now 37 -- posts like this in less
than four days, I think the people who need
a bath are us.
Have a good time in limbo, Judy, inflicting
your venom on those who have to put up with
it between now and Friday midnight. We don't.
