--- In [email protected], "Richard J. Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> However, in a previous post you did seem equate > Brahman with 'nothing', by using a quasi-Nagarjuna > syllogism. But according to Shankara, Brahman is is > not a 'nothing', but is Sat-Chit-Ananda, three > fundamental attributes: Being, Conciousness, and > Bliss. Thanks Willy and nicely put!! In Vedanta, Brahman is regarded as the > source and essence of the material universe. > Maharishi teaches that the experience of absolute > bliss conciousnerss, satchitananda, is the result > of experiencing Transcendental Conciousness. > The goal of Maharishi's TM is to reside perpetually > within saccidananda, a state which Maharishi refers > to as samadhi. Now, that's it - I'm not goping to > argue with you about it. Maharishi's teaching has > now been established by Billy, a TM Governor, who > probably knows more about it than you do, since > you've obviously been reading to much Ken Wilber. > We've been over this before and you failed to respond > to my objection to you eqauting Brahman with nothing > by incorrectly misappripriating Nagarjuna's 'Four > Negations'.
