--- In [email protected], "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], "do.rflex" <do.rflex@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In [email protected], "shempmcgurk" <shempmcgurk@>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> 
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- In [email protected], "shempmcgurk" 
> <shempmcgurk@> 
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> 
> > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In [email protected], "shempmcgurk" 
> > > > <shempmcgurk@> 
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > <snip>
> > > > > > > Gore, equally, lives in a fantasy land where imagined 
> dangers
> > > > > > > to the planet are concocted in his mind and propagated 
> > > > > > > unremittingly by him to the public.  Like the Energizer 
> Bunny,
> > > > > > > he goes on and on about global warming without any 
> concern 
> > > > about 
> > > > > > > truth or the impact his words will have on others.  He 
> has 
> > > built
> > > > > > > a fantasy wall around himself in which he -- and he 
> alone --
> > > > > > > cares about the world and all others be damned.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Well, no, in fact none of the above is true.
> > > > > > Gore is very much in line with most current
> > > > > > scientific thinking about global warming and
> > > > > > has most of his facts straight, all the
> > > > > > important ones, according to climate scientists.
> > > > > 
> > > > > And which climate scientists are those?
> > > > 
> > > > http://www.realclimate.org/index.php?p=299
> > > > http://tinyurl.com/2e6vba
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Yawn.
> > > 
> > > Typical global-warming-fear-monger propaganda.
> > > 
> > > I counted 11 scientists listed under the "people" link.
> > > 
> > > Hardly a ringing endorsement.
> > 
> > 
> > Of course Shemp ignores the following:
> > 
> > 
> > The National Academies of Science represent the scientific 
> communities
> > of 11 major nations of the world.
> > 
> > Brazil
> > Canada
> > China
> > France
> > Germany
> > India
> > Italy
> > Japan
> > Russia
> > United Kingdom
> > United States of America
> > 
> > *See their report* on Climate Change here: http://tinyurl.com/3ykvyg
> > 
> > AND,
> > 
> > The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [IPCC]
> > 
> > Recognizing the problem of potential global climate change, the 
> World
> > Meteorological Organization (WMO) and the United Nations Environment
> > Programme (UNEP) established the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
> > Change (IPCC) in 1988. It is open to *ALL* members of the
> > UN and WMO.
> > 
> > *See their report* on Climate Change here:
> > http://www.ipcc.ch/about/about.htm
> > 
> > Maybe you'd like to try to count how many scientists these groups
> > represent. Then maybe you could show 'your' side of the story by
> > presenting a comparable body of scientists that don't come from
> > either right wing conspiracy freaks or people or groups funded by 
> Big
> > Oil and acting as their shills.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ...and who is funding the organisations -- all political -- that you 
> cite above?  
> 
> Why, governments, of course which are POLITICAL...


And that makes their world-wide collective findings of the reality of
global warming illegitimate, HOW ?????


 
> So thank you for invoking the principle of funding...it makes my 
> point.






Reply via email to