--- In [email protected], new.morning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "curtisdeltablues" > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote: > > > > I think this point of view may be good for things you can't change, > > but for things you can change it cuts off a valuable human motivator: > > noticing the difference between what we have and what we want.
One might think it would work that way, but I haven't found that to be true at all; I am still motivated to dynamically accomplish everything I wish to do, but it's out of love, fullness and inspiration, not out of suffering or lack :-) > > "Accepting" being overweight or poor seems like a shortcut of our > > ability to effect change in our lives. My happiness expands every > > time I take action to bring me from where I am to where I want to be > > in every area of my life. It is not a "war" inside myself. > > > > Of course I may have missed his and your point completely... > > Perhaps, because the point is astounding. A rather implausible > hypothesis, an opinion really, is offered up at a workshop, and it > appears to be taken as fact. I take it as fact, because I've actually tried it and found it works, like many thousands of others :-) >I wouldn't bet the farm on that > hypothesis. A little research would be helpful. Like actually trying it...? :-) >The statement reminds > me a bit of Ron, taking a teacher de jours view as firm established, > unquestioned, unexamined truth. At least the claim is falsifiable. > Better than some truth claims offered up here. Perhaps this IS the new > physics. Stop the presses -- The REAL source of cause and effect has > been found. No, no, you were right, Richard -- your Wok is the way to go! "Don't love what IS, what is is the rotting corpse of God" -- priceless! A perfect recipe for continued denial and suffering! Talk about loving the status quo! :-) *L*L*L*
