--- In [email protected], new.morning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], Vaj <vajranatha@> wrote: > > > > > > On Aug 31, 2007, at 2:06 PM, authfriend wrote: > > > > > Vaj means to say, of course, "It's pretty strange for > > > an editor to claim they're different." He's the one > > > claiming there's no distinction between them. > > > Shitfest. > > > > No, that's not what I'm claiming. > > > Shitfest redux. > Maybe you need an example.
"new.morining is a total moronic perv unevolved lump of clay, lying, piece of shit, unable to tell itself fromn shinloa, deceptive, tricky, prone to gross exageration, a total fuck-up, did i say un-evolved, wominizer (I wish), muddle headed, psychotic, needy asshole, drug using, shaki-inverted, aghora-punk, wild salmon eating sin-fest, anti-burning man, whore-monger, loser, uneducated, ignorant, off the program, in bondage, too intellectual, retarded, passive-aggressive, angry, fat, out of shape, aetheist, dogmatic, true-believing, god-intoxicated retard, nihilist, didn't get laid enough, got laid too much, projecting, not organic, non-vastu, skrewd jyotish chart, lying, pie-hole piece of shit, alkaloiding, organic vegan freak, funky, lying, decrepid piece of shit!" I can respond to this "insightful" projective, doesn't know me from adam, crap, piece of art, --- or let it be. my choice. And your choice for similar crap about "you". Doesn't push my buttons. Does such push yours? Correct the record? Give a break! There is no record with shallow, dare i say idiotic posts. Some posts don't deserve to be responded to. Unless you are obsessively fixated on, on, on, .. who knows. This post is directed to no one in particular. But if the shoe fits ...
