From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of TurquoiseB
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2007 3:12 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Civil Speech and Behavior

 

The easiest way -- and in my opinion the most effec-
tive way -- to deal with people whose language or 
whose intent or whose actions or opinions piss you 
off is to IGNORE THEM. If they've established a 
history of getting under your skin, JUST DON'T
LET THEM. 

This is what I do, and have suggested several times as a solution. 

I like this suggestion from New Morning: “I do however support, in the
guidelines, a ban on profanities hurled
against someone. But not used for emphasis -- ocassionally. Thus "You
F*ckhead!" would be against the guidelines. "Thats f*cking awsome" --
used occasionally, would be OK.”

What do others think of this? Part of the issue is, where do we draw the
line? If one of our participants were black, and others were hurling racial
slurs at him, I think we would all agree that those people should be
censored or banned. Same with gay bashing. These are now social taboos in
our culture. But insulting people individually is not taboo, just poor
manners. How civil do we want our little FFL society to be? Some valuable
contributors have left because of the incivility. 

You say, “I would *not* advise any form of
"moral guidelines" here, because they would be subjec-
tive and by definition imposed upon those who don't
agree with them, and they would force Rick or the
other moderators to become "cops." I would not wish
that on them.”

And I keep expressing the same sentiment. 

You also made the point that one can be nastier without using expletives
than another might be in using them. Bob Brigante responded to my initial
post in this thread with, “Piss off, you idiot.” However Bob meant it, I
interpreted that as a friendly, funny response.

Taking any sort of action on this issue requires a subjective judgment, and
I just don’t know if my subjectivity is objective enough to do that. I’m
willing to try something, if there’s a consensus, but so far I don’t think
there is.


No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.485 / Virus Database: 269.13.8/993 - Release Date: 9/6/2007
3:18 PM
 

Reply via email to