Adam Reynolds wrote: > Ok now this gets interesting... > My perception of Farcry is one of a good CMS that is extensible. > > What those 'extensions' are is irrelevant. Farcry dictates how I hook up > that functionality. What it doesn't do is dictate how I write that code.
Sounds a lot like you are only scratching the surface ;) > However if you are saying Farcry is a framework, within which we created > a CMS application, then let's take this further. > > As far as I understand it, the way you extend Farcry is through includes. > > Frameworks can and do dictate the way you go about designing (OO etc) > and developing code, as well as the way the various parts of your system > communicate. Well the primary building block of FarCry extensibilty is actually the "content type" -- the "include" is essentially a hack to allow folks to integrate external code that is not written to comply with the framework. I can see I better put together a series of examples for 4.0 to put this all this across. I might set up a public demo of our soon to be released commercial CRM. Its not quite ready for prime time but I think it might at least dispel the notion of FarCry just simply being an extensible CMS. Till then, -- geoff http://www.daemon.com.au/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "farcry-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/farcry-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
