On May 9, 10:23 am, Ezra Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Let me begin by saying that I have not worked with FarCry for very > long, so I am not heavily invested in the present licensing model as > others on this list may be. I am also proceeding under the assumption > that any non-distributed derived works would not need to be released. > As I understand this, it means that any code in a plugin, project, or > skeleton need not be published as long as my client retains the > copyright and does not share the code with other organizations. If > someone is aware that this interpretation is incorrect, or sees some > obvious pitfalls, please clarify as necessary.
This is our understanding of the GPL. To reiterate, private modifications, retained within a single organisation are not subject to the GPL. It's only if you choose to distribute those changes does the GPL come into effect. -- geoff http://www.daemon.com.au/ PS. I am not a lawyer! This is not legal advice :) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "farcry-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/farcry-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
