On May 10, 6:04 pm, Justin Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > We are left with the prospect of > > staying with the current 2.x release (on no support and grey areas re: > > licensing), upgrading and adhering to GPL, or removing the code base > > entirely. > > I'm sure you realise, but this is similar to what FarCry developers > may experience if the license changes to the GPL.
That is a bit flippant. The current state of our licensing is not in doubt. Nor is our transparency in discussing options for a licensing change to GPL. If we make the change to GPL/Commercial, current and future FarCry developers will have clear options to: A) stay with FarCry 4.0 under CPL, with a supported maintenance branch B) upgrade to FarCry 5.0 and adhere to the GPL C) upgrade to FarCry 5.0 and purchase a Commercial license D) go and use some body else's code base Incidentally, we agree with extJS's decision to move to GPL/ Commercial, especially in light of the way certain members of their community were behaving. As the developers of FarCry we have an obligation to do our best to ensure we comply with the license of the code bases we embed. Hence, in respecting extJS's position we need to do something about our use of their library and moving forward ensure that we adhere to their licensing terms. Best regards, -- geoff http://www.daemon.com.au/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "farcry-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/farcry-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
