On May 10, 10:51 am, modius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On May 10, 6:04 pm, Justin Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > We are left with the prospect of > > > staying with the current 2.x release (on no support and grey areas re: > > > licensing), upgrading and adhering to GPL, or removing the code base > > > entirely. > > > I'm sure you realise, but this is similar to what FarCry developers > > may experience if the license changes to the GPL. > > That is a bit flippant. > > The current state of our licensing is not in doubt. Nor is our > transparency in discussing options for a licensing change to GPL. > > If we make the change to GPL/Commercial, current and future FarCry > developers will have clear options to: > > A) stay with FarCry 4.0 under CPL, with a supported maintenance branch > B) upgrade to FarCry 5.0 and adhere to the GPL > C) upgrade to FarCry 5.0 and purchase a Commercial license > D) go and use some body else's code base
Sorry, I didn't mean that there were any greay areas with FarCry's licensing at all, or your transparency or willingness to discuss moving to GPL, so please don't take that comment the wrong way! I just meant that existing FarCry developers may need to make a decision to go with one of the 4 options you have outlined here. It requires us to make a decision, which for some will be easy and others not so easy because of lack of understanding, or other factors. cheers, Justin. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "farcry-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/farcry-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
