AFAIK, 1and1 dont currently offer coldfusion support in any of their packages.
On Mar 4, 6:20 pm, Marco van den Oever <[email protected]> wrote: > And Mark thanks for noticing about the url rewrite issue, also good to > know :( > > On Mar 4, 7:18 pm, Marco van den Oever <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > BazD, > > > Like Jeff stated above, and also me, and others have tried fc 5 on > > shared server on hms, it's simply to crowded on the servers, even > > sites which are without a framework have several restarts and now and > > then some slowing down. > > > Derek, > > > Very interesting link, those are prices and performances i can work > > with indeed, now some further investigation on how their support is > > and how they are reflected on the web in forums etc. > > > And of course now, buy coldfusion, a one time investment for that > > server, or go with open source which i think is somewhat tricky to put > > clients etc on, for instance if i follow the openbd google threads i > > see a lot of issues and problems i really don't want to invest time > > in... > > > Thanks, > > > Marco. > > > On Mar 4, 6:23 pm, Derek <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I too like HMS support and have been happy with them. I'm also going > > > down the road of multiple clients on a machine at a hosting company > > > but I can't use HMS cause they're a little too pricey for VPS or > > > dedicated. I'm thinking of going with 1&1 because the have dedicated > > > servers at real good prices - $119/month for Windows and $99 for Linux > > > and gets you a nice box with 2GB of RAM. That might help some of you > > > guys looking to pay a little less while having enough horsepower for > > > CF and Farcry. That being said, I've never used 1&1 but they are a > > > huge hosting company so I bet their service is good. Anyone ever used > > > them for dedicated servers? > > > > Windows dedicated servers: http://order.1and1.com/xml/order/ServerWindows > > > Linux:http://order.1and1.com/xml/order/ServerRoot > > > > On Mar 4, 12:10 pm, BazD <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Marco, > > > > > Wouldnt farcry 5 work perfectly on a HMS shared server or have their > > > > been problems getting it to work ? Havnt tried Farcry 5 yet, still > > > > figuring out v4 myself.... > > > > > On Mar 4, 4:44 pm, Marco van den Oever <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi Tunç, > > > > > > Let me begin with agreeing that hms give excellent service, that's the > > > > > reason i am searching for solutions with them, great support indeed, > > > > > in 'good and bad' times. > > > > > > Personally i thought of the VPS pro package which provide 2 g ram and > > > > > sufficient space etc, it could be payable by eventually, in time, > > > > > placing at least 50 clients on it with small to medium size websites, > > > > > but is it possible... that's the question... > > > > > > Of course i could run a try out on this but if halfway the road i see > > > > > it's not possible i'm stuck with existing accounts on a expensive > > > > > solution, with prices that are scaled on at least 50 accounts... > > > > > > BazD, > > > > > > Based on the above situation and what you tell me, i begin to believe > > > > > that my personal solution could only be a dedicated server... This is > > > > > getting a expensive situation, best solution would be small accounts > > > > > per clients, on hms that gives problems, so i might first have to > > > > > search for some other providers that won't have this timeout and > > > > > overloaded situation... > > > > > > Where is that hoster that gives framework based hosting up and > > > > > running, and of course for farcry? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Marco. > > > > > > On Mar 4, 3:51 pm, BazD <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Marco, > > > > > > > 1GB VPS shouldnt be a problem if all you are doing is running a few > > > > > > farcry applications and perhaps an email service like smartermail, > > > > > > verity, and a few basic HTML sites. How many hits the sites get also > > > > > > contributes to the memory useage as more hits = more sessions = more > > > > > > memory for coldfusion requirements. > > > > > > > Lack of memory tends to lead to services shutting themselves down. > > > > > > Coldfusion seems to be the main memory eater. I regularly have to > > > > > > restart coldfusion service on my 1GB VPS due memory shortages, > > > > > > roughly > > > > > > once every 2 months or so. One day I will look into a 2GB VPS, but > > > > > > at > > > > > > the moment, they are expensive solution. To help overheads on my > > > > > > VPS, > > > > > > Ive hosted the SQL databases on a separate shared database server > > > > > > instead of running them on the VPS. > > > > > > > I would steer clear of 512mb VPS running coldfusion. Cause nothing > > > > > > but > > > > > > headaches IMHO. > > > > > > > On Mar 4, 2:23 pm, <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > I wouldn't recommend less than 1GB RAM. We are with HMS and even > > > > > > > 1GB is not > > > > > > > enough. I had to turn verity off. I believe they will come with > > > > > > > VPS 2.0 > > > > > > > option at the end of first quarter. They have 2GB option at the > > > > > > > moment but > > > > > > > quite expensive especially when you don't want CF8 Enterprise and > > > > > > > massive > > > > > > > space. > > > > > > > > They give excellent service. > > > > > > > > Tunç > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > > From: [email protected] > > > > > > > [mailto:[email protected]] On > > > > > > > > Behalf Of BazD > > > > > > > Sent: 04 March 2009 13:38 > > > > > > > To: farcry-dev > > > > > > > Subject: [farcry-dev] Re: Cutting down application start-up time > > > > > > > > Reducing application scope overheads is something that I am very > > > > > > > much > > > > > > > interested in, especially when having several farcry projects > > > > > > > sharing > > > > > > > the same core. Most VPS solutions tend to have 512mb min, 2GB max > > > > > > > memory, which Coldfusion can fill up relatively easily on > > > > > > > frequently > > > > > > > accessed sites. > > > > > > > > B > > > > > > > > On Mar 4, 1:09 pm, Jeff Coughlin <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mar 3, 2009, at 11:38 PM, modius wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hmm... this is unusual. It takes my dev laptop less than 10 > > > > > > > > > secs to > > > > > > > > > restart an application with a stable full of plugins. 5.1 > > > > > > > > > should be a > > > > > > > > > quicker starter than 5.0. Would be interesting to know how > > > > > > > > > many > > > > > > > > > content types/rules you have in place on the application. > > > > > > > > > Might be > > > > > > > > > you have a large application. Alternatively it suggests that > > > > > > > > > the host > > > > > > > > > has an abysmally powered server (or under resourced server). > > > > > > > > > I've seen the same thing when I tested with HMS shared hosting. > > > > > > > > A > > > > > > > > vanilla install of FarCry 5.0 and 5.1 would take longer to > > > > > > > > startup > > > > > > > > than their default 50 second timeout. Thus I couldn't get the > > > > > > > > site to > > > > > > > > start without them turning off the 50 second timeout for that > > > > > > > > site > > > > > > > > (not an available option). > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > Jeff Coughlin > > > > > > > > Web Application Developerhttp://jeffcoughlin.com > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "farcry-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/farcry-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
