Marco, Wouldnt farcry 5 work perfectly on a HMS shared server or have their been problems getting it to work ? Havnt tried Farcry 5 yet, still figuring out v4 myself....
On Mar 4, 4:44 pm, Marco van den Oever <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Tunç, > > Let me begin with agreeing that hms give excellent service, that's the > reason i am searching for solutions with them, great support indeed, > in 'good and bad' times. > > Personally i thought of the VPS pro package which provide 2 g ram and > sufficient space etc, it could be payable by eventually, in time, > placing at least 50 clients on it with small to medium size websites, > but is it possible... that's the question... > > Of course i could run a try out on this but if halfway the road i see > it's not possible i'm stuck with existing accounts on a expensive > solution, with prices that are scaled on at least 50 accounts... > > BazD, > > Based on the above situation and what you tell me, i begin to believe > that my personal solution could only be a dedicated server... This is > getting a expensive situation, best solution would be small accounts > per clients, on hms that gives problems, so i might first have to > search for some other providers that won't have this timeout and > overloaded situation... > > Where is that hoster that gives framework based hosting up and > running, and of course for farcry? > > Thanks, > > Marco. > > On Mar 4, 3:51 pm, BazD <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Marco, > > > 1GB VPS shouldnt be a problem if all you are doing is running a few > > farcry applications and perhaps an email service like smartermail, > > verity, and a few basic HTML sites. How many hits the sites get also > > contributes to the memory useage as more hits = more sessions = more > > memory for coldfusion requirements. > > > Lack of memory tends to lead to services shutting themselves down. > > Coldfusion seems to be the main memory eater. I regularly have to > > restart coldfusion service on my 1GB VPS due memory shortages, roughly > > once every 2 months or so. One day I will look into a 2GB VPS, but at > > the moment, they are expensive solution. To help overheads on my VPS, > > Ive hosted the SQL databases on a separate shared database server > > instead of running them on the VPS. > > > I would steer clear of 512mb VPS running coldfusion. Cause nothing but > > headaches IMHO. > > > On Mar 4, 2:23 pm, <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I wouldn't recommend less than 1GB RAM. We are with HMS and even 1GB is > > > not > > > enough. I had to turn verity off. I believe they will come with VPS 2.0 > > > option at the end of first quarter. They have 2GB option at the moment but > > > quite expensive especially when you don't want CF8 Enterprise and massive > > > space. > > > > They give excellent service. > > > > Tunç > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > > > > Behalf Of BazD > > > Sent: 04 March 2009 13:38 > > > To: farcry-dev > > > Subject: [farcry-dev] Re: Cutting down application start-up time > > > > Reducing application scope overheads is something that I am very much > > > interested in, especially when having several farcry projects sharing > > > the same core. Most VPS solutions tend to have 512mb min, 2GB max > > > memory, which Coldfusion can fill up relatively easily on frequently > > > accessed sites. > > > > B > > > > On Mar 4, 1:09 pm, Jeff Coughlin <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Mar 3, 2009, at 11:38 PM, modius wrote: > > > > > > Hmm... this is unusual. It takes my dev laptop less than 10 secs to > > > > > restart an application with a stable full of plugins. 5.1 should be a > > > > > quicker starter than 5.0. Would be interesting to know how many > > > > > content types/rules you have in place on the application. Might be > > > > > you have a large application. Alternatively it suggests that the host > > > > > has an abysmally powered server (or under resourced server). > > > > > I've seen the same thing when I tested with HMS shared hosting. A > > > > vanilla install of FarCry 5.0 and 5.1 would take longer to startup > > > > than their default 50 second timeout. Thus I couldn't get the site to > > > > start without them turning off the 50 second timeout for that site > > > > (not an available option). > > > > > -- > > > > Jeff Coughlin > > > > Web Application Developerhttp://jeffcoughlin.com > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "farcry-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/farcry-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
